Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Padilla v. Nevada Gaming Control Board et al
as 2:2022cv02109
Plaintiff:
Shawn Padilla
Defendant:
Nevada Gaming Control Board and MGM Grand Hotel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Dzik v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01982
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Dzik
Defendant:
Johnson, Steve Sisolak, Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sconiers v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01739
Plaintiff:
Antwoine Sconiers
Defendant:
Warden Calvin Johnson, Kay, Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01738
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Johnson, Kay, Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carroll et al v. City of Las Vegas et al
as 2:2021cv00372
Defendant:
Virgilio Padilla, Officer Dorado, Frances Boddie-Small and others
Plaintiff:
Mariam Blue and Lisa Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv00618
Defendant:
Sheriff Joseph Lombardo, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Padilla Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Padilla v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2020cv00352
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Genevieve Craggs, Joseph Lombardo and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Padilla v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2020cv00066
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Robert Knickerbocker, Genevieve Craggs and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
