Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Pagan v. Morton
as 1:2023cv02010
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ortiz Pagan
Defendant:
Roxanne Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAGAN v. CITY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2023cv03835
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY NATHINIEL PAGAN and JEFFERY NATHINIEL PAGAN
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER, HOWARD HOLLAND, OCIE MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pagan v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01502
Plaintiff:
Yuitza Pagan
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PAGAN v. MASON et al
as 2:2023cv03434
Petitioner:
JOSE PAGAN
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pagan v. VisionQuest National, LTD.
as 2:2023cv01715
Plaintiff:
Xavier Jason Pagan
Defendant:
VisionQuest National, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
PAGAN v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL LTD.
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Ruben Pagan
Defendant:
VISIONQUEST NATIONAL LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ortiz-Pagan v. Hartye et al
as 1:2022cv02036
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ortiz-Pagen and Carlos Ortiz-Pagan
Defendant:
Joseph F. Hartye, Judge William T. Tully and Mary Klatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PAGAN v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2022cv04751
Petitioner:
JUAN PAGAN
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
