Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Mahoney v. Saris et al
as 1:2023cv10290
Plaintiff:
Edward Mahoney and Brian Mahoney
Defendant:
Judge Patti B. Saris, Clerk Matthew Paine, Claride Geraldino-Karasek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaul, MD v. Boston Partners, Inc et al
as 1:2021cv10326
Defendant:
North Jersey Media Group Inc, Boston Partners, Inc, Robert Heary,MD and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lavoie v. Pain D'Avignon II, Inc.
as 1:2020cv11683
Defendant:
Pain D'Avignon II, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lavoie
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lyons v. Giordano et al
as 4:2019cv40003
Defendant:
Thomas Giordano, Town of Sturbridge and Sean Paine
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lyons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The City of Boston et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv12174
Plaintiff:
The City of Boston, The Boston Public Health Commission and The Boston Housing Authority
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, New England Wellness & Pain Management, P.C., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Amicus Curiae:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Opalenik v. Saveur de Pain, Inc.
as 3:2018cv12160
Plaintiff:
Amanda Opalenik
Defendant:
Saveur de Pain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Opalenik v. Saveur de Pain, Inc.
as 3:2018cv12160
Plaintiff:
Amanda Opalenik
Defendant:
Saveur de Pain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cooper v. California Pizza 5th Floor et al
as 1:2015cv14202
Plaintiff:
John Cooper
Defendant:
California Pizza 5th Floor, Boston Medical Center, Au Bon Pain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Katz v. O'Connell et al
as 1:2015cv13025
Plaintiff:
Sarah A. Katz
Defendant:
Michael J. O'Connell , Nita Grover , Hugh Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157 b
Garcia v. O'Connell et al
as 1:2015cv12818
Defendant:
Michael J. O'Connell, Joshua L. Greenspan, David Tung and others
Plaintiff:
Jojayra Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
