Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Mattila v. City of Wasilla et al
as 3:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Lonny P. Mattila
Defendant:
City of Wasilla, David Burtch, Robert Cheek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mattila v. City of Palmer et al
as 3:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Lonny P. Mattila
Defendant:
City of Palmer, Michael Lynch, Sawyer Skiba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hafley v. State of Alaska at Palmer
as 3:2021cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jason Hafley
Defendant:
State of Alaska at Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Palmer Courthouse et al
as 3:2021cv00131
Petitioner:
Keen L.A. Smith, JR.
Respondent:
Palmer Courthouse and Goose Creek Corr. Cntr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Niemann v. State of Alaska 3rd Judicial District Palmer et al
as 3:2021cv00046
Defendant:
Kristensen, Arron Edwards, Dianne Thoben and others
Plaintiff:
Aleaha R. Niemann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Alaska Governor et al
as 4:2020cv00029
Defendant:
Alaska Governor, Alaska DOC Director and Alaska Attorney General
Plaintiff:
James Dion Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Palmer v. Governor of Alaska et al
as 3:2020cv00138
Respondent:
Director of Alaska DOC, Governor of Alaska and Attorney General of Alaska
Petitioner:
James Dion Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Palmer et al v. Stryker, Orthopedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Richard D Palmer and Joyce Palmer
Defendant:
Stryker, Orthopedics, Inc. and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cathey v. Palmer Probation et al
as 3:2016cv00282
Petitioner:
Wynter Jai Cathey
Respondent:
Palmer Probation and Troy Henley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America et al v. City of Palmer, Alaska
as 3:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Alaska
Defendant:
City of Palmer, Alaska
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
