Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Valle v. Medical Director et al
as 4:2023cv02113
Plaintiff:
Martin F Valle
Defendant:
Medical Director and Pam Lychner State Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valle v. Medical Director et al
as 9:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Martin F. Valle
Defendant:
Medical Director and Pam Lychner State Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. T.D.C.J. et al
as 4:2017cv02408
Plaintiff:
Carl Frank Johnson, III
Defendant:
T.D.C.J., Holiday - Huntsville, Texas, Pam Lychner - Humble, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warfield v. Pam Lychner State Jail
as 4:2017cv01664
Plaintiff:
Larry Warfield
Defendant:
Pam Lychner State Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins Nyabwa v. Pam Lychner
as 17-20121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLLINS O. NYABWA
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN PAM LYCHNER, State jail, Individually and Official Capaciity
Collins Nyabwa v. Warden
as 16-20436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLLINS O. NYABWA
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, Individual and Official Capacity, Pam Lychner State Jail
Hunter v. Warden at Pam Lychner Sate Jail et al
as 4:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
Terry Hunter
Defendant:
Warden at Pam Lychner Sate Jail and Robert Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. Hooker, et al
as 09-8065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, d/b/a as Bernard Madoff
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. HOOKER, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, PROJECT SAFE CHILDHOOD and others
Riches v. Hooker, et al
as 09-8065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, d/b/a as Bernard Madoff
Defendant - Appellee:
T. J. HOOKER, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, PROJECT SAFE CHILDHOOD and others
Riches v. Convicted Child Molesters et al
as 2:2009cv00093
Defendant:
Sex Offender Management Assistance Program, Rape Abuse and Incest National Network, T J Hooker and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches doing business as Bernard Madoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
