Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Harrison v. Ploughe
as 1:2015cv01382
Petitioner:
Thurman Harrison, Jr.
Respondent:
Pamela J. Ploughe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stogsdill v. Ploughe et al
as 1:2014cv02683
Petitioner:
Charles Stogsdill
Respondent:
Pamela J. Ploughe and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2012cv01018
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertolo v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv02822
Plaintiff:
James M. Bertolo
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Tony Carochi, Pamela J. Ploughe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2011cv00614
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Aristedes (I) Zavaras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2011cv00145
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallory v. Jones et al
as 1:2010cv02564
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mallory
Defendant:
Susan Jones, Pamela J. Ploughe, Aristedes W. Zavaras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kneen v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv01284
Plaintiff:
Ronald Emmett Kneen
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Herb (I) Spiwak, Herb Spiwak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmon v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv02133
Plaintiff:
Matthew Tazio Redmon
Defendant:
Aristedes (I) Zavaras, Aristedes Zavaras, Pamela (I) J. Ploughe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
