Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
United States of America v. Frias
as 26-1024
Defendant:
JOHNNY DE LA ROSA, Jesus, Cruz Antonio Rodriguez and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Jordan (Acevedo)
as 26-153
Defendant:
KEITH JORDAN, BRIAN HANNA, KATINA REED and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv26010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Papi Gordos Hospitality LLC et al
as 2:2025cv03374
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated
Defendant:
Papi Gordos Hospitality LLC doing business as Papi Gordo's and Victor Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv21985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corporation v. Papis Garage Corp et al
as 1:2025cv21708
Plaintiff:
Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corporation
Defendant:
Papis Garage Corp and Manuel Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
MENA v. PAPI CHURRO, SUSHI OG, MISS CRISPY RICE LLC et al
as 1:2025cv21250
Plaintiff:
JOSUE MENA
Defendant:
PAPI CHURRO, SUSHI OG, MISS CRISPY RICE LLC and ANDREW MAYER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
