Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff A et al v Park Hill School District et al
as 5:2021cv06153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, Plaintiff C and others
Defendant:
Park Hill School District, Janice Bolin, Bart Klein and others
Interested Party:
Tara Garcia and Chris Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Northland Parent Association v. Board of Education of Excelsior Springs School District et al
as 4:2021cv00623
Plaintiff:
Northland Parent Association
Defendant:
Board of Education of Excelsior Springs School District #40, Kearney R-1 School District, Board of Education of Kearney R-I School District and others
J.B. Doe v. Park Hill School District et al
as 5:2014cv06110
Defendant:
Park Hill School District, Scott Springston, Timothy Todd and others
Plaintiff:
J. B. Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv06062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv06118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Park Hill School District v. Dass et al
as 5:2007cv06125
Plaintiff:
Park Hill School District
Defendant:
Kevin Dass and Cheryl Dass
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Park Hill School District v. Dass et al
as 5:2007cv06093
Plaintiff:
Park Hill School District
Defendant:
Kevin Dass and Cheryl Dass
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv06079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
