Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Parker, Jr. v. Dew
as 3:2023cv04607
Plaintiff:
Gregory E. Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
Budget Truck Rental, LLC. and KSBNM & BNM Logistics Corp.
4Th Party Plaintiff:
Safii Jamal Dew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Tweed et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04180
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Carrier Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Carrier Fire & Security Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Tweed, Angela Martin, James Phillip Mikles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Parker v. USA
as 4:2016cv01786
Petitioner:
James Harold Parker, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Parker v. Tin Roof Acquisition Company LLC
as 3:2015cv04630
Plaintiff:
Gregory E Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Tin Roof Acquisition Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parker v. USA
as 4:2014cv02416
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Harold Parker, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Parker et al
as 4:2010cv02900
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Jones
Defendant:
Sanford M Parker, Jr, Chesterfield County, Ritchie Rollins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore et al v. Parker Trucking Inc et al
as 7:2009cv01294
Plaintiff:
Jerry Joe Moore, II and April Moore
Defendant:
Parker Trucking Inc, Parker Trucking Inc, Jesse W Parker, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Parker v. USA
as 4:2007cv70118
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Harold Parker, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. Parker et al
as 4:2007cv03036
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Jones and Elizabeth Jones
Defendant:
Sanford M Parker, Jr, Chesterfield County Sheriff's Department, Chesterfield County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Foot
as 4:2007cv00366
Petitioner:
Monroe R Parker, Jr
Respondent:
Phillip A Foot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
