Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jolliff et al v. City of Catoosa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Jolliff and Kyle Parnell
Defendant:
City of Catoosa, Oklahoma, Cody Workman, Robert Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bain v. GOE et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Keith Elliott Bain
Defendant:
GOE/ LRCF, Warden Cole, John Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parnell v. Habti
as 4:2022cv00232
Petitioner:
Ashley Lorene Parnell and Ashley Parnell
Respondent:
Aboutanna El Habti and Aboutanaa El Habti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parnell v. Phillips 66 Company
as 4:2020cv00642
Plaintiff:
John D Parnell
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Adkins et al
as 5:2020cv01007
Defendant:
FNU Adkins and FNU Parnel
Plaintiff:
Everett Dewayne Hill, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parnell et al v. Pinnacle Pizza Inc et al
as 5:2020cv00237
Defendant:
Pinnacle Pizza Inc, Pinnacle Pizza Corporation, Steve Dolan and others
Plaintiff:
Parnell and Christopher Parnell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Muhammad v. Dawson et al
as 5:2018cv00911
Defendant:
R Parnell, Bonnie Green, J Rankins and others
Plaintiff:
Ab'dullah Lamar Rashid Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
North Star Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. v. Grayson et al
as 6:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
North Star Mutual Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Cameron Grayson, Josh Gill, Justice Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parnell v. USA
as 6:2016cv00175
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenneth Edward Parnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nicholson et al v. Fresenius USA Inc et al
as 5:2014cv01114
Plaintiff:
Joy Nicholson , Belinda Patrick , Debra Prather and others
Defendant:
Fresenius USA Inc , Fresenius USA Manufacturing Inc , Fresenius USA Marketing Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
