Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Padilla v. Abbott et al
as 3:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Brian Collier, Texas Board of Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macias v. #176 Judicial Dist., Ct. et al
as 3:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Carlos Macias
Defendant:
#176 Judicial Dist., Ct., Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Ct., Texas Prison Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. United States Parole Commission
as 3:2023cv00411
Petitioner:
Michael Norwood
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nails v. Pardons and Paroles et al
as 3:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Elliot Nails
Defendant:
Board of Pardons and Paroles, Department of Correction, Connection, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Texas Board of Paroles et al
as 3:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Texas Board of Paroles and Texas Prison System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Tx. Parole Dept Director et al
as 3:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Tx. Parole Dept Director and Greg Abbott
Stone v. United States Parole & Probation
as 3:2021cv00807
Defendant:
United States Parole & Probation and USA
Plaintiff:
Terry Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Schlosser v. Kwak et al
as 3:2020cv00393
Defendant:
Milton Walsh, William Krahe, Hunchu and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Schlosser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Bansley / Anthony / Burdo LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01869
Defendant:
Corrections, Michael E. Boardman, Bansley / Anthony / Burdo LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bennie Gray, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Texas Board of Pardons/Paroles et al
as 3:2019cv01594
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Texas Board of Pardons/Paroles, Texas Prison Parole Depts. and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael H. Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
