Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lynch v. Shears et al
as 1:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Tavars D Lynch
Defendant:
Danny Shears, Alton Craft, Tim Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. Pettway et al
as 2:2020cv00806
Defendant:
Mark Pettway and Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc
Plaintiff:
James W Parsons, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv08019
Petitioner:
Walter Jason Parsons
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Parsons v. Franklin County Jail
as 3:2019cv02129
Respondent:
Franklin County Jail
Petitioner:
Walter Andrew Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parsons v. Maddox et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2016cv00120
Plaintiff:
Brian Jake Parsons
Defendant:
William K. Maddox, Troy Silva, Lee Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons v. Maddox et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Brian Jake Parsons
Defendant:
William K. Maddox, Troy Silva, Lee Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starks v. Williams et al
as 5:2014cv02320
Plaintiff:
Ernest L. Starks
Defendant:
David Williams, Jr., Louis Parsons, Matthew Edgar and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons v. Escambia County Detention Center et al
as 1:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
Brannon Deon Parsons
Defendant:
Escambia County Detention Center and Atmore Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Parsons
as 2:2011cv00353
Plaintiff:
Antoine Luvertte Williams
Defendant:
Mac Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pardue v. Parsons et al
as 2:2007cv01679
Petitioner:
Terry Ray Pardue
Respondent:
Mac Parsons and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
