Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Deal v. Department of Prison Records et al
as 5:2018ct03086
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Prison Records, Health Department Records, Department of Prison Combined Records and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deal v. Easley et al
as 5:2018ct03077
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant:
Mike Easley, Beverly Perdue, Pat McCrory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2017ct03187
Plaintiff:
Eustiquiano Armando Soto
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Pat McCrory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ-GARCIA v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2016cv01348
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS LOPEZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
PAT MCCRORY and UNKNOWN OWNERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aguilar v. McCrory et al
as 5:2016ct03311
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Castellanos Aguilar
Defendant:
Pat McCrory and Unknown Owners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bart McClain v. Pat McCrory
as 16-7570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BART FITZGERALD MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
PAT MCCRORY, FRANK PERRY, GEORGE SOLOMON and others
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and COLUMBUS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Siddhanth Sharma v. Pat McCrory
as 16-7484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIDDHANTH SHARMA
Defendant - Appellee:
PAT MCCRORY and WAKE COUNTY
Wright v. McCrory et al
as 5:2016ct03280
Plaintiff:
Jerone Demond Wright
Defendant:
Pat McCrory, State of North Carolina, Frank L. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. McCrory et al
as 5:2016ct03278
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Pat McCrory, Frank L. Perry, State Treasurer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. McCrory et al
as 5:2016ct03279
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Pat McCrory, Frank L. Perry, Charles Everette Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
