Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Applen, et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
as 4:2012cv01818
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Plaintiff:
David D. Applen , Linda K. Bennett , Bobby G. Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv02633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Patricia Neale Watson vs. Las Vegas Valley Water District
as 2:2000cv01338
Defendant:
Las Vegas Valley Water District
Plaintiff:
Patricia Neale Watson
Cause Of Action: Title VII
WATSON v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06208
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA E. WATSON
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patricia Watson v. Secretary of Labor
as 10-6382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA D. WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY OF LABOR, United States Department of Labor
Patricia Ann Watson v. A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-84305
Defendant:
A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Watson
WATSON v. A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv84305
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA ANN WATSON and PATRICIA ANN WATSON
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Watson v. Solis
as 3:2009cv00131
Plaintiff:
Patricia D Watson and Patricia D Watson
Defendant:
Hilda Solis
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
