Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Raburn v. Henderson Co Sheriffs Office et al
as 6:2021cv00389
Plaintiff:
Jack Cody Raburn
Defendant:
Henderson Co Sheriffs Office, FNU Faught, FNU Bernett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Johnson
as 3:2020cv00672
Defendant:
Patrick Johnson
Plaintiff:
Tony D Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Wyche et al
as 5:2020cv00556
Defendant:
Robert Bobby Wyche, Court of Appeal 2nd Circuit, 1st Judicial District Court and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Price v. Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv00072
Defendant:
Wade Murphy, Patrick Johnson and Paul Campbell
Plaintiff:
Triney Lavelle Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center et al
as 5:2019cv01626
Plaintiff:
Patrick Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Caddo Parish Correctional Center, Sgt Engleade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Ouachita Correctional Center et al
as 3:2019cv01507
Defendant:
Patrick Johnson and Ouachita Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Markeivion Ray Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00219
Plaintiff:
Patrick Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Gonclaves et al v United States of America
as 1:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gonclaves, Niles Belk, Kelvin Andre Spotts and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Ryan Johnson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-41374
Petitioner - Appellant:
RYAN PATRICK JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Mayes v. Ouachita Correctional Center et al
as 3:2014cv03500
Plaintiff:
Dennis Levece Mayes
Defendant:
Ouachita Correctional Center, Patrick Johnson, Connie Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
