Cases 41 - 50 of 51
USA v. Patrick Johnson
as 11-16038
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICK JOHNSON
William Johnson v. John Baldwin, et al
as 10-3573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Patrick Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
John Baldwin, IDOC Director, Sheryl Lockwood, Eastern Asst Dept. Director, Jerry Bartruff, Religious Coordinator and others
Taken v. USA
as 2:2010cv01781
Petitioner:
Patrick Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2009cv02553
Petitioner:
David Patrick Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flemming v. Fischer et al
as 9:2009cv01152
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Donald Selsky, Joseph Bellnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flemming v. Fischer et al
as 6:2009cv06457
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Donald Selsky, Joseph Bellnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Baldwin
as 4:2009cv00271
Plaintiff:
William Patrick Johnson
Defendant:
John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dart et al
as 1:2009cv02545
Plaintiff:
Anthony Patrick Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County Dept. of Corrections, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LEVI et al
as 2:2009cv01292
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PATRICK JOHNSON
Defendant:
TROY LEVI and FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv21081
Petitioner:
Patrick Johnson
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
