Cases 1 - 10 of 140
ANDREWS v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES,LLC
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
PAUL ANDREWS
Defendant:
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mcdermott v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Paul Andrew Mcdermott
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GXP Impact Consulting LLC et al v. Turvey
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
GXP Impact Consulting LLC, Paul Obringer and Nessiem Samuel
Defendant:
Paul Andrew Turvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Labarbera v. Carmona Suarez et al
as 8:2023cv02700
Plaintiff:
Paul Andrew Labarbera
Defendant:
Osniel Carmona Suarez, Rayden Rodriguez Morejon and USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Martinez v. Scott et al
as 6:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Paul Andrew Martinez
Defendant:
Shane Scott and Gary Pinkerton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WYCKOFF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10265
Plaintiff:
PAUL ANDREW WYCKOFF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EMERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17028
Plaintiff:
PAUL ANDREW EMERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv05580
Plaintiff:
Paul Andrew Martin
Defendant:
Sherry Franks, Robin Souvenir, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Lee
as 23-1177
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL ANDREW LEE
VOELKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09219
Plaintiff:
PAUL ANDREW VOELKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
