Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 268
Williams v. Schuette et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv14237
Plaintiff: Donnell DeFrance Williams
Defendant: Bill Schuette, Daniel H. Heyns, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON and others
Roosevelt Rupert v. Paul Klee
as 16-2543
Petitioner - Appellant: ROOSEVELT RUPERT
Respondent - Appellee: PAUL KLEE, Warden
Reedy v. West et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv13876
Plaintiff: David Reedy
Defendant: Michael West, Wade, Martin and others
Hullihen #866331 v. Klee We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01282
Petitioner: Blake Daniel Hullihen #866331
Respondent: Paul Klee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Kemp, Jr. v. Paul Klee
as 16-2514
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIAM FREDERICK KEMP, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: PAUL KLEE
Doe 1 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv13765
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections, Rick Snyder, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Plaintiff: John Doe 1 , John Doe 2 , John Doe 4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hugo Rodriguez v. Paul Klee
as 16-2419
Petitioner - Appellant: HUGO LOAIZA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee: PAUL KLEE, Warden
Raleem-X v. William Borgerding, et al
as 16-2353
Plaintiff - Appellant: RALEEM-X
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM BORGERDING, Doctor, DONALD E. HAPDEE, O.D., PRISONER COUNSELOR S. KING and others
Kensu v. Borgerding, M.D. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv13505
Plaintiff: Temujin Kensu #189355
Defendant: William Borgerding, M.D. , Cathy Lewis, Sabrina Aikens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu #189355 v. Lewis et al
as 2:2016cv13482
Plaintiff: Temujin Kensu #189355
Defendant: Cathy Lewis, Sabrina Aikens, Brian Evers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?