Cases 1 - 10 of 18
FOMB, et al v. Pabon Bosques, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO
Appellant:
LUIS F. PABON BOSQUES, RAUL MARTINEZ PEREZ, ELVIN A. ROSADO MORALES and others
Defendant:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY, LUIS M. COLLAZO RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacities as Administrator of the Retirement System for Employees of the Government of Puerto Rico and Executive Director of the Government of Puerto Rico Retirement Board and others
Interested Party:
FRANCISCO J. TOLEDO MENDEZ
US v. Hernandez-Negron
as 24-1081
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
HECTOR HERNANDEZ-NEGRON, a/k/a Tito Quiju
Interested Party:
STEERING COMMITTEE and PEDRO R. PIERLUISI
Cruz v. UIA, et al
as 23-2011
Plaintiff:
REYNALDO CRUZ
Defendant:
UNION INDEPENDIENTE DE EMPLEADOS DE LA AUTORIDAD DE ACUEDUCTOS Y ALCANTARILLADOS, (UIA), PUERTO RICO AQUEDUCT & SEWER AUTHORITY, PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS
Intervenor:
OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES OF THE PUBLIC BUILDINGS AUTHORITY UNION and STATE INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEES UNION
Clemente Properties, Inc., et al v. Pierluisi-Urrutia, et al
as 23-1922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLEMENTE PROPERTIES, INC., 21 IN RIGHT, INC., ROBERTO CLEMENTE, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HON. PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth and in his personal capacity, COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, EILEEN M. VELEZ-VEGA, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Transportation and Public Works and in her personal capacity and others
Rodriguez-Cotto, et al v. Pierluisi-Urrutia, et al
as 23-1626
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SANDRA RODRIGUEZ-COTTO and RAFELLI GONZALEZ-COTTO
Defendant / Appellant:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, Governor of Puerto Rico, DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ, Secretary of Department of Justice, ALEXIS TORRES, Secretary of Puerto Rico Department of Public Safety and others
Defendant:
INES DEL C. CARRAU-MARTINEZ
Interested Party:
PEN AMERICAN CENTER, INC. and CLINIC FIRST AMENDMENT UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA LAW SCHOOL
Arroyo v. Tribunal Administrativo de Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2023cv01030
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Arroyo
Defendant:
Tribunal Administrativo de Puerto Rico, Departamento de Justicia de Puerto Rico, Hon. Jose Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clemente Properties, Inc. et al v. Pierluisi et al
as 3:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Clemente Properties, Inc., 21 In Right, Inc., Roberto Clemente Jr. and others
Defendant:
Pedro R. Pierluisi, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Eileen M. Vlez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
In Re: Commonwealth Of Puerto Rico, et al
as 22-1278
Petitioner:
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, PEDRO R. PIERLUISI, Govenor and ANA I. ESCOBAR-PABON, Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, JUVENILE INSTITUTIONS ADMINISTRATION, ZORAIDA BUXO and others
Interested Party:
ORLANDO L. MARTINEZ, Orlando L. Martinez, Monitor, Office of the Ct. Monitor, AIJ, US District Ct., District of P.R.
Marrero et al v. Pierluisi-Urrutia et al
as 3:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
Francisco O Marrero, Ligia Noa, Jessica Marrero and others
Defendant:
Pedro R. Pierluisi-Urrutia, Alexis Torres, Antonio Lopez-Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez-Velez, et al v. Pierluisi-Urrutia
as 21-2005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZULAY RODRIGUEZ-VELEZ, YOHAMA GONZALEZ-MILAN, LEILA G. GINORIO-CARRASQUILLO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his Official Capacity as Governor of The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Interested Party:
ASOCIACION DE ALCALDES DE PUERTO RICO and LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
