Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jonkheer v. Desselles et al
as 4:2019cv00916
Defendant:
City of Pelican Bay and Ronny Desselles
Plaintiff:
Sterling Jonkheer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS)Tannenbaum v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2018cv02732
Defendant:
Warden of Deuel Vocational Institution, CSR of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Director of the entire Calfornia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Tannenbaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finstad v. City of Pelican Bay, Texas et al
as 4:2014cv00488
Plaintiff:
Robin Finstad
Defendant:
City of Pelican Bay, Texas and Cass Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Thymes v. People of the State of California et al
as 5:2014cv02377
Plaintiff:
John A. Thymes
Defendant:
People of the State of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ardell v. C.D.C. Pelican Bay State Prison Officer in-charge et al
as 3:2013cv01048
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith Ardell
Defendant:
C.D.C. Pelican Bay State Prison Officer in-charge and Crescent City Prison State of California Department of Correction Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frankum et al v. Towns et al
as 4:2009cv00765
Plaintiff:
Eddie Frankum and Jennifer Frankum
Defendant:
Gilbert Towns and City of Pelican Bay, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16404
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2004cv03339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
