Cases 1 - 6 of 6
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Collins et al
as 8:2021cv02413
Plaintiff:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant:
Dr. Francis Collins, National Institutes of Health, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Shore Transit et al
as 1:2021cv02083
Plaintiff:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant:
Shore Transit, Brad Bellacicco and Tri-County Council of the Lower Eastern Shore of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins et al v. Tri-State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01225
Plaintiff:
Constance Collins and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert L. Candy, Tri-State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc. and Animal Park, Care & Rescue, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Candy et al v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02335
Plaintiff:
Animal Park, Care and Rescue, Inc., Tri-State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc. and Robert L. Candy
Defendant:
Colin Henstock, Delcianna Winders, Chris Fontes and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Candy et al v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01549
Plaintiff:
Robert Candy , Animal Park, Care and Rescue, Inc. and Tri State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc.
Defendant:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. , Brittany Peet, Holly Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Tri-State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02148
Plaintiff:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant:
Tri-State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc., Animal Park, Care & Rescue, Inc. and Robert L. Candy
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
