Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Jones et al v. Pepsico, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00210
Plaintiff:
Mary Jones and Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Pepsico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Michael Martinucci, et al v. Tropicana Products Inc, et al
as 19-8027
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARTINUCCI, BERNADETTE SALERNO, DEZZI RAE MARSHALL and others
Not Yet Classified:
PEPSICO INC, ANGELENA LEWIS, on Behalf of Themselves and all Others Similarly Situated and TROPICANA PRODUCTS INC, a division of PepsiCo, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv13654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv03918
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SOX v. MCLANE NEW JERSEY, INC. et al
as 5:2015cv05655
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SOX
Defendant:
MCLANE NEW JERSEY, INC. , MCLANE COMPANY, INC. , MCLANE/MID-ATLANTIC, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
DEDICATED MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Cross_defendant:
MAT BOWEN , ROBERT BURRUS , RUSSELL GORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
KOCHMANSKY v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05481
Plaintiff:
LISA KOCHMANSKY
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY, PEPSICO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carroll v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv06388
Plaintiff:
Julian Carroll
Defendant:
PEPSICO INC. and TROPICANA PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
