Cases 21 - 30 of 6,688
United States of America v. Rodriguez (Fernandez Colon)
as 24-1157
Defendant:
ERIC MANUEL FERNANDEZ COLON, ABEL MONTILLA, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Perez Hernandez, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2734
Plaintiff:
JESUS ANTONIO PEREZ HERNANDEZ and JUAN CARLOS VAZQUEZ AVILA
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Ferral Rodriguez et al. v. Mayorkas et al.
as 4:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Mariselis FERRAL RODRIGUEZ, Gretel MONTALVO FROMETA, Reinel LEIVA CRUZ and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Alejandro Mayorkas and Anthony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Smith v. Ebanks
as 24-1097
Not Yet Classified:
AHTWANA SMITH and LAKUAN EBANKS
Defendant:
ROC NATION LLC, CEO Desiree Perez, REFORM ALLIANCE, CEO Robert Rooks, DAMON DASH and others
US v. Perez-Pucha
as 24-1381
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ROBERTO CARLOS PEREZ-PUCHA
Dowling v. City of Houston
as 5:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Angela D. Dowling and Angela D. Dowling Perez
Defendant:
City of Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
In re: Jean-Elie Charlemagne
as 24-11225
Petitioner:
In re: JEAN-ELIE URIEL CHARLEMAGNE
Respondent:
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, COMMISSIONER, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES and others
Perez-Leon v. Garland
as 24-2455
Petitioner:
OCTAVIO PEREZ-LEON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Holt et al v. Maduro Moros et al
as 1:2024cv20701
Plaintiff:
Joshua Holt, Thamara B Holt, Derek Holt and others
Defendant:
Nicolas Maduro Moros, Cartel of the Suns, Vladimir Padrino Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
USA v. Perez-Jacome
as 24-50306
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eres De Jesus Perez-Jacome
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
