Cases 1 - 10 of 116
PEREZ v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
GLORIA PEREZ
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
RICHARDSON v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TREY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, BRANDY LEEK, ANTHONY BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRICIA PRETORIUS, DUSHAW ZATECKY, SARAH SNOWDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDMOND v. WEXFORD HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv02144
Plaintiff:
JAMARR EDMOND
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH, NOE MARANDET, K. MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. PRETORIOUS et al
as 1:2023cv01621
Plaintiff:
JOSE PEREZ
Defendant:
PATRICIA PRETORIOUS, CHAD PLATT and KEITH HARTZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLURE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MCCLURE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JAMES BASINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JONES
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, CENTURION OF HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. CENTURION SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
CENTURION SERVICES and PABLO PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DOE #1 et al
as 2:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
