Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Fuentes v. Fields
as 19-2841
Petitioner / Appellant:
Peter Fuentes
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Fields
Fuentes v. The District Attorney of NYC
as 19-1843
Defendant / Appellee:
R. Reed, SCC, C.A.P. Unit, New York County District Attorney and Ruby J. Krajick
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Peter Fuentes
Fuentes v. Fields
as 1:2018cv11294
Petitioner:
Peter Fuentes
Respondent:
Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuentes v. Habeas Corpus et al
as 1:2018cv11232
Plaintiff:
Peter Fuentes
Defendant:
The VA, Habeas Corpus, The Pentagon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuentes v. Bent et al
as 3:2014cv01352
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Peter Fuentes
Defendant:
Brigham Hospital, Brigham Hospital Lawyers, Boehner and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Fuentes et al v. PA State Police et al
as 3:2014cv01078
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Peter Fuentes, Michael Andrew Fuentes, Jr., Mary Linda Margretta Fuentes and others
Defendant:
PA State Police, PA Interrogators, Dept of Motor Vehicles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fuentes v. Spectre et al
as 3:2014cv00798
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Peter Fuentes
Defendant:
Arlen Spectre, Former PA. Governors, All PA. U.S. District Attorneys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuentes v. Unemployment Compensation Board of PA et al
as 3:2014cv00615
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Peter Fuentes
Defendant:
Unemployment Compensation Board of PA, Unknown ICE Agents, Unknown Arresting Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuentes v. Maiberger et al
as 3:2014cv00616
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Peter Fuentes
Defendant:
Richard Maiberger, Kenneth Berv, Latie Nabib and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuentes v. Martinez et al
as 1:2013cv05764
Plaintiff:
Peter Fuentes
Defendant:
P.O. Martinez and NYPD 105th Pct.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
