Cases 31 - 40 of 360
Phelps v. Toomey
as 3:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Judge Joel B. Toomey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gorbey v. John Doe, et al
as 23-11850
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a.k.a. Chief Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, SIS, FNU VALISTERO, Psychology Supervisor, FNU MILLER, Case Manager Coordinator and others
William Phelps, Sr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-11713
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM LYNN PHELPS, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gorbey v. Doe et al
as 5:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey and Chief Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
John Doe, FNU Valistero, FNU Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Penny Phelps v. Rick Ramsay, et al
as 23-11299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PENNY PHELPS
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK RAMSAY, CARA ANNE HIGGINS, LAUREN JENAI and others
PHELPS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14143
Plaintiff:
BOBBY PHELPS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SOUTHERN SPEAR IRONWORKS LLC v. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv09292
Plaintiff:
SOUTHERN SPEAR IRONWORKS LLC
Defendant:
HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and TRAVELERS CASAULTY AND SURETY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Phelps v. Kimbrell
as 3:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Kimbrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Dixon
as 3:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finley-Sanders v. Phelps
as 1:2023cv00995
Petitioner:
Leshunta Finley-Sanders
Respondent:
Shannon Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
