Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Phelps v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02659
Plaintiff: Ramona Phelps
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Seyler-Schmidt v. Business Airfreight et al
as 1:2008cv00456
Plaintiff: Paul L. Seyler-Schmidt
Defendant: Business Airfreight, Embraer Aircraft Customer Services Inc., Embraer Aircraft Holding Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Phelps v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2008cv40103
Plaintiff: Coy Phelps
Defendant: Michael Mukasey, Harley Lappin, Carolyn Sabol and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Phelps v. Sabol, et al
as 08-1474
Plaintiff - Appellant: COY PHELPS
Defendant - Appellee: CAROLYN A. SABOL, HARVEY LAPPIN and ALBERTO R. GONZALES
Bracero v. Enaw et al
as 1:2008cv10156
Plaintiff: Joseph Bracero
Defendant: Augustine G. Enaw, Mark Schnabel, N.P., Russell Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Sabol
as 4:2008cv40003
Plaintiff: Coy Phelps
Defendant: Carolyn Sabol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Riordan, et al
as 1:2007cv12329
Plaintiff: Catherine Phelps
Defendant: Denis Riordan, Emilio T Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
O'Neill v. Enaw et al
as 1:2007cv12177
Plaintiff: James W. O'Neill
Defendant: Augustine G. Enaw, Mohamed, Russell Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Sabol et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv40245
Petitioner: Coy Phelps
Respondent: Carolyn Sabol, Christopher Carr, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Phelps v. Sabol
as 4:2007cv40189
Petitioner: Coy Phelps
Respondent: Carolyn A. Sabol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?