Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Thi Thanh Ngoc Doan, Duc Hinh Pham, Minh Hieu Pham and others
Defendant:
Vuong Ba Do, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Cypers v. Bankcard Central LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00382
Defendant:
Bankcard Central LLC, Rev 19 LLC, Larry Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Rory Justin Cypers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PHI Group, Inc. 401(k) Plan v. Muniz et al
as 4:2021cv00730
Defendant:
Mary Lund, Cristina Muniz, Jean Close and others
Plaintiff:
PHI Group, Inc. 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Phi v. Asphalt & Fuel Transport LLC d/b/a AF Transport
as 1:2021xc00012
Plaintiff:
Van Phi
Defendant:
Carter Prather and Asphalt & Fuel Transport LLC d/b/a AF Transport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phi v. Prather et al
as 3:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
Van Phi
Defendant:
Carter Prather, Asphalt & Fuel Transport LLC d/b/a AF Transport and Asphalt & Fuel Transport LLC doing business as AF Transport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHI Health, LLC v. WFAS, Inc.
as 7:2020cv00196
Plaintiff:
PHI Health, LLC and PHI Air Medical LLC
Defendant:
WFAS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Viet Phi Nguyen v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00460
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Viet Phi Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
