Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Kaseen v. Deml et al
as 2:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
King Kaseen
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml, Phil Scott, Jennifer Sprafke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosson v. Vermont Department of Children and Family Services et al
as 5:2021cv00090
Defendant:
Phil Scott, Devil, Commissioner of Adult Protectives and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Crosson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosson v. Donovan et al
as 5:2021cv00088
Defendant:
Phil Scott, Devil, T.J. Donovan and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Crosson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Crosson v. Vermont Department of Labor et al
as 5:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Michele Brown, Government Officials, Bernie Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Crosson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosson v. Town of Bellows Falls et al
as 5:2021cv00091
Defendant:
Town of Bellows Falls, State Reps, Raymond Massucco and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Crosson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Condos et al
as 2:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
Reuell E. Peterson and Reuel E. Peterson
Defendant:
Jim Condos and Phil Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Scott et al
as 5:2020cv00149
Plaintiff:
Reuel E. Peterson
Defendant:
Phil Scott and Mark Levine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Scott
as 5:2020cv00076
Defendant:
Phil Scott
Plaintiff:
Revel E. Peterson and Reuel E. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amu'ra El v. All foreign Agents and Agencies of the United States Corporation Company et al
as 1:2019cv04075
Defendant:
Phil Scott, Steve Bullock, Doug Burgum and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal B. Amu'ra El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bedell v. Menard
as 19-853
Respondent:
Phil Scott, Governor of Vermont and T.J. Donovan, Attorney General
Respondent / Appellee:
Lisa Menard, Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
Clinton Bedell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
