Cases 1 - 10 of 12,495
GRAHAM v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2024cv01862
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY GRAHAM
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, ENOR INTERNATIONAL, INC. doing business as Techno Torch, BIC USA Inc. and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01822
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1774
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF PHILADELPHIA & VICINITY et al v. KEVIN RYDER, INC
as 2:2024cv01799
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY, TEAMSTERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and MARIA SCHEELER
Defendant:
KEVIN RYDER, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
HARDAWAY v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 2:2024cv01841
Plaintiff:
AVERY JAMES HARDAWAY
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LISTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LISTER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER REGINALD GRAHAM and JOHN DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raymond David v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1773
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DAVID
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lillian Graham v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1707
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN GRAHAM
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS, PHILA POLICE DEPT 39TH DISTRICT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
