Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Laney Sweet, et al v. LQ Management LLC, et al
as 22-15771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANEY SWEET, an individual, on behalf of E.S., N.S., and the estate of Daniel Shaver
Plaintiff:
GRADY SHAVER, Individually and surviving father of: deceased Daniel Shaver and NORMA SHAVER, Individually and as surviving mother of: deceased Daniel Shaver
Defendant / Appellee:
LQ MANAGEMENT LLC
Defendant:
PHILIP MITCHELL BRAILSFORD, CORRINE BRAILSFORD, husband and wife, CHARLES J. LANGLEY and others
Laney Sweet, et al v. Philip Brailsford, et al
as 22-15269
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LANEY SWEET, an individual, on behalf of E.S., N.S., and the estate of Daniel Shaver
Plaintiff:
GRADY SHAVER, Individually and surviving father of: deceased Daniel Shaver and NORMA SHAVER, Individually and as surviving mother of: deceased Daniel Shaver
Defendant / Appellant:
PHILIP MITCHELL BRAILSFORD and CORRINE BRAILSFORD, husband and wife
Defendant:
CHARLES J. LANGLEY, CITY OF MESA, an Arizona municipal corporation, BRIAN ELMORE and others
Laney Sweet, et al v. Charles Langley, et al
as 22-15271
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LANEY SWEET, an individual, on behalf of E.S., N.S., and the estate of Daniel Shaver
Plaintiff:
GRADY SHAVER, Individually and surviving father of: deceased Daniel Shaver and NORMA SHAVER, Individually and as surviving mother of: deceased Daniel Shaver
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES J. LANGLEY
Defendant:
PHILIP MITCHELL BRAILSFORD, CORRINE BRAILSFORD, husband and wife, CITY OF MESA, an Arizona municipal corporation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05831
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Sweet v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Sweet and Laney Sweet
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Philip Mitchell Brailsford, Corrine Brailsford and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Grady Shaver and Norma Shaver
Petitioner:
Monique Portillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
