Cases 1 - 10 of 359
Phillips v. Ivey
as 4:2024cv00395
Petitioner:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Respondent:
Governor Katherine Ivey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Mitchell
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Roderick Lee Williams
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell
Swain v. Murray et al
as 4:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Antonio Swain
Defendant:
Billy Murray, Brown, Phillip Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Smith
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell and A.D.O.C.
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08003
Petitioner:
Timothy Allen Phillips
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rives v. Hamm et al
as 4:2023cv01659
Petitioner:
Walter Richard Rives
Respondent:
John Q. Hamm, Phillip Mitchell and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Murray et al
as 4:2023cv01471
Plaintiff:
Stephen Earl Adams
Defendant:
Billy J Murray, Greg Walker, Lonzo Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Officer Gaither et al
as 4:2023cv01441
Plaintiff:
Kyle Butler
Defendant:
Officer Gaither, Officer Ward, Officer Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. N Dorm Side Cube Office
as 2:2023cv01136
Plaintiff:
Phillip Spencer
Defendant:
N Dorm Side Cube Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Beckman et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lamar Berry
Defendant:
Randall Beckman, Deputy Phillips and James Brazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
