Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Reeves v. Brian Stirling/SCDC
as 0:2024cv00528
Petitioner:
Phillip C Reeves
Respondent:
Brian Stirling/SCDC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves v. Warden / Director
as 0:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
Phillip C Reeves
Defendant:
Warden / Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Reeves v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2022cv04616
Petitioner:
Phillip C Reeves and Phillip Charles Reeves
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Director, Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Reeves v. Roberts
as 6:2022cv04410
Plaintiff:
Phillip C. Reeves, Beneficiary and Natural Person
Defendant:
April Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Reeves v. Holden et al
as 6:2022cv04145
Plaintiff:
Phillip C. Reeves, Beneficiary and Natural Person
Defendant:
Gregory Maxwell Holden, John Haen, Christopher D. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Reeves v. SCDC et al
as 8:2013cv01205
Plaintiff:
Phillip C Reeves
Defendant:
SCDC and Perry Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Luberda v. Purdue Frederick Corp et al
as 4:2013cv00897
Plaintiff:
Daniel C Luberda
Defendant:
Purdue Frederick Corp , Purdue Pharma LP , Purdue Pharma Company, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bradford v. Holtzclaw et al
as 3:2009cv02107
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dean Bradford
Defendant:
Officer Holtzclaw, Phillip C Anderson, Sharon Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Daniels v. Anderson et al
as 0:2009cv01674
Plaintiff:
Jermel Rashond Daniels
Defendant:
Phillip C Anderson, Tony Davis, Officer Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Davis v. Greenwood County Detention Center et al
as 0:2008cv01805
Plaintiff:
Allen Lee Davis
Defendant:
Greenwood County Detention Center, Phillip C Anderson and Judge Sanders
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
