Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Betts v. Pierce County Jail
as 3:2018cv05326
Petitioner:
Danielle Denae Betts
Respondent:
Pierce County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swan v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2018cv05329
Plaintiff:
Dewaun James Swan
Defendant:
City of Tacoma, Pierce County Jail and Tacoma Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swan v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2018cv05310
Plaintiff:
Dewaun James Swan
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail and City of Tacoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Doe Sheriff's Deputy #1 et al
as 3:2017cv06046
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Evans
Defendant:
John Doe Sheriff's Deputy #1, Jane Doe Wife, John Doe Sheriff's Deputy #2 and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Correct Care Solutions LLC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Pierce County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simpson v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv05466
Plaintiff:
Dejon Michael Dewayne Simpson
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, Kathleen Proctor, Brent Hyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2016cv05455
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Wilson
Defendant:
Pierce County , Pierce County Jail , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patu v. Pierce County Jail Staff
as 3:2016cv05196
Plaintiff:
Ricky Patu
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Pierce County Jail Classification and Administration Office et al
as 3:2016cv05044
Plaintiff:
Ray Charles Harris
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail Classification and Administration Office, Mark Lindquist, G Pero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patu v. Alexander et al
as 3:2015cv05332
Plaintiff:
Ricky Patu
Defendant:
Lee and Pierce County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2015cv05012
Plaintiff:
Dimple D Blake
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, Tacoma Police Department and Thurston County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
