Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Deskins v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv00987
Plaintiff:
Pierre Deskins
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Pierre Investments, Inc et al v. Anspach Meeks Ellenberger, LLP et al
as 3:2022cv00932
Plaintiff:
Pierre Investments, Inc, Pierre Investments, Inc. doing business as Gehard Luxury Homes and Ken Gazian
Defendant:
Anspach Meeks Ellenberger, LLP, Anspach Law and Kent D Riesen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Clervrain et al v. Madden et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandko, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Madden, Jon Husted, Dave Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. USA
as 1:2020cv01223
Petitioner:
Pierre A. Campbell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Steward v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00170
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Pierre Steward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Spyrou v. Pierre et al
as 1:2018cv00527
Plaintiff:
Minas Spyrou
Defendant:
Jean Mary Pierre , Werner Enterprises, Co. , Werner Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Logan v. USA
as 5:2016cv01474
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Pierre Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chatmon v. LaRose
as 1:2015cv00719
Petitioner:
Pierre Chatmon
Respondent:
Christopher LaRose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Sears Dept Store Midway Mall et al
as 1:2013cv00821
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Davis
Defendant:
Sears Dept Store Midway Mall, Lisa Lockgraves, Edward Zeleski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
