Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Jordan v. City of Doraville et al
as 1:2024cv03771
Defendant:
P.O. Nalepa, P.O. Pike and City of Doraville
Plaintiff:
Christopher Roshod Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PIKE v. EFOBI et al
as 5:2024cv00260
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, WELLPATH and DOCTOR ELLIS EFOBI
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SEAN PIKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Drake
Defendant:
Sheriff James Woodruff, Brady Pike, Erick Durrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. Nimms et al
as 3:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Drake
Defendant:
Wesley Grizzards Nimms, Chandler Chief Zimmermans, Bobby Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Pike v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Shelby Pike
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 4:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
QUARTEZ THOMAS
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN, Sergeant CHARLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Pike v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01816
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pike
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pike v. Troup County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00226
Defendant:
Troup County Jail, Sheriff James Woodruff and Captain Marty Reeves
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sean Pike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
