Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Pew v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv00421
Defendant:
Lt. Vance, Heather Halderman, Sharon Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Perry Burris, Shawn Strawn, Edward Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mohammad Saleem v. Brungart, et al
as 20-1610
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK GARMAN, Superintendent, JOSEPH DUPONT, Chief Hearing Examiner's Office, G. MCMAHON, Deputy Superintendent and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMMAD SOHAIL SALEEM
Cooper v. Garman et al
as 1:2019cv02227
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Kauert, Mark Garman, Trisha Pilosi and others
Plaintiff:
Jamil Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saleem v. Brungart et al
as 3:2019cv00025
Defendant:
T. Miller, Morris Houser, Joseph DuPont and others
Plaintiff:
Schail Mohammad Saleem and Mohammad Sohail Saleem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abarca et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2019cv00050
Plaintiff:
Claudia Garcenot, Susan Crimp, Marc Werfel and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Hogue et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12052
Plaintiff:
Marc Resch, Michelle Morgan Bundock, Alicia Munoz and others
Defendant:
Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Bell v. Rothrock et al
as 4:2018cv02177
Defendant:
Hearing Examinder T. Pilosi, D.O.C., C/O Rothrock and others
Plaintiff:
T. Montana Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Sherman et al
as 1:2017cv02064
Plaintiff:
Jamil Cooper
Defendant:
Sherman, Thompson, Mark Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coit v. Garman et al
as 1:2017cv01438
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
Garman, Pasquale, Hashenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Shearer et al
as 1:2017cv01027
Plaintiff:
Albert Singleton
Defendant:
Shearer, Jr., Z. Miller and T. Pilosi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
