Cases 41 - 50 of 350
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dobbins v. Pinellas County Jail et al
as 8:2022cv02283
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robert Dobbins
Defendant:
Pinellas County Jail and Pinellas County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vertex Development, LLC vs. Pinellas County, Florida
as 8:2022cv02012
Plaintiff:
Vertex Development, LLC
Defendant:
Pinellas County and Pinellas County, Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Metzger II v. Pinellas County Jail
as 8:2022cv01892
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Metzger II
Defendant:
Pinellas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boeji v. Pinellas County Jail
as 8:2022cv01521
Plaintiff:
Edward Gordon Boeji
Defendant:
Pinellas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2022cv01418
Petitioner:
Ulysses Drake, Jr. doing business as Our Family Ministry
Respondent:
State of Florida and Pinellas County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOWE v. PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 4:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PATRICK HOWE
Defendant:
PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 4:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
REGINALD THOMPSON
Defendant:
PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and FLORIDA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
