Cases 1 - 10 of 41
James Lee Pinkerton v. James Engelman
as 2:2023cv06648
Petitioner:
James Lee Pinkerton
Respondent:
James Engelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
James Lee Pinkerton v. United States Parole Commission
as 2:2021cv05739
Plaintiff:
James Lee Pinkerton
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Modoral Brands Inc. v. Swedish Match North America LLC et al
as 2:2021cv05013
Defendant:
Swedish Match North America LLC, NYZ AB and Pinkerton Tobacco Co., LP
Plaintiff:
Modoral Brands Inc.
Counter Claimant:
wm17 Holding GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Glaze v. Daane et al
as 4:2021cv01093
Defendant:
Stephen Daane, Dr. Beadies, John Zink and others
Plaintiff:
Isaiah T Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv08310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv08307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pinkerton Tobacco Co., LP et al v. Kretek International, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv08729
Defendant:
Dryft Sciences, LLC and Kretek International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
NYZ AB, Swedish Match North America, LLC and Pinkerton Tobacco Co., LP
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Pinkerton Tobacco Co., LP et al v. The Art Factory AB et al
as 2:2020cv01322
Plaintiff:
NYZ AB, Swedish Match North America LLC, WM17 Holding GMBH and others
Defendant:
Kretek International, Inc., Dryft Sciences, LLC, Tillce AB and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Denise Pinkerton v. New Body MD LLC et al
as 8:2018cv02195
Plaintiff:
Denise Pinkerton
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Sweat, MD, PC, John F. Burnett, Joseph R. Porche and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
