Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Thai Nippon Rubber Industry Public Limited Company v. Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv09749
Plaintiff:
THAI NIPPON RUBBER INDUSTRY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
Defendant:
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. and PRODUCTS LICENSING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lathario Scott v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02421
Defendant:
Playboy Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lathario Scott
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. v. Fashion Nova, Inc.
as 2:2020cv09846
Defendant:
Fashion Nova, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06448
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chatman v. McLaren & Lexus et al
as 3:2018cv01165
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Defendant:
McLaren & Lexus, Lexus, Mercedez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re DMCA Section 512(h) Subpoena to YouTube, LLC
as 2:2018mc00018
In Re:
DMCA Section 512(h) Subpoena to YouTube, LLC
Movant:
Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.
Respondent:
YouTube LLC
DMCA Subpoena to Imgur, Inc. et al
as 2:2018mc00016
Receiver:
DMCA Subpoena to Imgur, Inc.
Movant:
Playboy Entertainment Group Inc.
In re DMCA Section 512(h) Subpoena to Imgur, Inc.
as 2:2018mc00017
In Re:
DMCA Section 512(h) Subpoena to Imgur, Inc.
Respondent:
Imgur, Inc.
Movant:
Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.
Playboy Entertainment Group Inc v. Happy Mutants, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv08140
Defendant:
Does and Happy Mutants, LLC
Plaintiff:
Playboy Entertainment Group Inc
USA v. Raul Guzman-Ibarez
as 17-50141
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL GUZMAN-IBAREZ, AKA Raul Guzman, AKA Raul Ibarez Guzman, Jr., AKA Raul Ibarez, AKA Raul Guzman Ibarez, Jr., AKA Little Playboy, AKA Manuel Torres, AKA Miguel Duran Torres
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
