Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Anthony Braxton v. Larry Harrah
as 21-2279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY JAMES BRAXTON
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY E. HARRAH, Fayette County Prosecutor, in his Personal and Job Capacity, BRIAN PARSONS, Fayette County Prosecutor, in his Personal and Job Capacity and W. R. CALLISON, Drug Unit Member, in his personal capacity
Defendant:
DETECTIVE C. A. YOUNG, Oak Hill City Police Officer, in his Personal Capacity, WEST VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, in their official capacity, CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA DRUG TASK FORCE CORPORATION and others
Appanoose County et al v. Allergan PLC et al
as 1:2021op45051
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cerro Gordo County, Keokuk County, Iowa, Cherokee County and others
Appanoose County et al v. Allergan PLC et al
as 4:2021cv00095
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Hancock County, Cerro Gordo County, Keokuk County, Iowa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 md
POCAHONTAS COUNTY COMMISSION v. Purdue Pharmaceutical Products, LP et al
as 1:2018op45443
Plaintiff:
Pocahontas County Commission
Defendant:
Purdue Pharmaceutical Products, LP, Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
POCAHONTAS COUNTY COMMISSION v. Purdue Pharmaceutical Products, LP et al
as WVN/2:18-cv-00034
Plaintiff:
POCAHONTAS COUNTY COMMISSION
Defendant:
Purdue Pharmaceutical Products, LP , Purdue Pharma, LP , The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
POCAHONTAS COUNTY COMMISSION v. Purdue Pharmaceutical Products, LP et al
as 2:2018cv00034
Plaintiff:
POCAHONTAS COUNTY COMMISSION
Defendant:
Purdue Pharmaceutical Products, LP, Purdue Pharma, LP, The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
