Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Poe et al v. Drummond et al
as 4:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Peter Poe, Paula Poe, Patrick Poe and others
Defendant:
Gentner Drummond, Steven Katsis, Trevor Nutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Poe et al v. Salah et al
as 4:2020cv00175
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Stearns, Debra Stearns and Rebecca Poe
Defendant:
Abdifatah A. Salah and MNS1 Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Poe et al v. Salah et al
as 6:2020cv00104
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Stearns, Debra Stearns and Rebecca Poe
Defendant:
Abdifatah A. Salah and MNS1 Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00027
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beals v. Weygand et al
as 5:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Timothy L Beals
Defendant:
Sammy Weygand, Marc Daniels, Tanner Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poe et al v. Kiowa, Town of
as 6:2016cv00514
Plaintiff:
Cody Poe and Jerry Ford
Defendant:
Kiowa, Town of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Daugomah v. Roberts et al
as 5:2016cv01045
Plaintiff:
John Daugomah
Defendant:
Larry Roberts , Dan Deerinwater , Jessie Durham and others
Intervenor:
Joe E Poe, Jr , Charles Eisenberger and Mary Helen Deer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Poe v. Harvanek
as 4:2013cv00391
Petitioner:
Rocky Dean Poe
Respondent:
Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Poe v. Harvanek
as 4:2013cv00384
Petitioner:
Rocky Dean Poe
Respondent:
Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jocoy v. Grady County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2012cv00684
Plaintiff:
Beth D Jocoy
Defendant:
Grady County Board of County Commissioners , Chickasha City of , Mack Donald Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
