Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Smith v. Houston et al
as 3:2012cv00675
Plaintiff:
Delores S. Smith
Defendant:
Jimmy Houston and Ridgeland Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Cambell et al
as 1:2012cv00280
Plaintiff:
Clifton Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Cambell and Unknown Officers of the Biloxi Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Jackson Police Dept. et al
as 3:2012cv00627
Plaintiff:
Felix Calvin Cunningham
Defendant:
Jackson Police Dept., G. Jimerson, A. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clayton v. City of Olive Branch Police Dept. et al
as 2:2012cv00133
Plaintiff:
William Harold Clayton
Defendant:
City of Olive Branch Police Dept., City of Olive Branch, DeSoto Co. Sheriff's Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Bolivar County Sheriff et al
as 2:2012cv00048
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Ford
Defendant:
Bolivar County Sheriff, Cleveland Police Dept. and Cleveland City Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Garnett et al
as 1:2011cv00141
Plaintiff:
Develle Henderson
Defendant:
Chad Garnett, David Linley and Starkville Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Hancock County, MS Official et al
as 1:2010cv00245
Plaintiff:
Joseph Henry
Defendant:
Hancock County, MS Official, Bay St. Louis, MS Police Dept., Jerry O. Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nettles v. Waynesboro City Police Dept.
as 4:2010cv00058
Plaintiff:
Clarence E. Nettles
Defendant:
Waynesboro City Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Barbar et al
as 1:2009cv00197
Plaintiff:
Carl Jamison, Sr.
Defendant:
Tony Barbar and Verona Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lynch v. Satcher et al
as 4:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
David Lynch
Defendant:
William R. Satcher, Quitman Police Dept. and South Miss. Drug Task Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
