Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Larry Grant, et al v. City of Long Beach, et al
as 22-56143
Plaintiff: LARRY GRANT, on his own behalf and on behalf of his minor child, P.C., Individuals
Plaintiff / Appellant: P. C., Individual Guardian Ad Litem Larry Grant
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF LONG BEACH, LONG BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT and POLICE OFFICER RODRIGUEZ
Hafif v. Mansour
as 23-961
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dibo Hafif
Defendant / Appellee: Abraham Manopia, Evet Balas, Captain Derby St.Fort, 61st Precinct of NYPD and others
Larry Grant, et al v. City of Long Beach, et al
as 22-56121
Plaintiff / Appellant: LARRY GRANT, on his own behalf and on behalf of his minor child, P.C., Individuals
Plaintiff: P. C., Individual Guardian Ad Litem Larry Grant
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF LONG BEACH, LONG BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT and POLICE OFFICER RODRIGUEZ
Defendant: DOES, 1 through 15 Inclusive
Larry Grant et al v. City of Long Beach et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv06666
Plaintiff: Larry Grant, Ph Ce and P. C.
Defendant: City of Long Beach, Long Beach Police Deparment, Police Officer Rodriguez and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Richard Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Floyd v. City of New York
as 21-2091
Plaintiff: Lalit Clarkson, Deon Dennis and David Ourlicht, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant: David Floyd
Defendant / Appellee: City of New York, Mayor Bill de Blasio, individually and in his official capacity and Commissioner Raymond Kelly, New York City Police, in his official capacity and individually
Defendant: New York City Police Officer Rodriguez, New York City, in his official and individual capacity, New York City Police Officer Goodman, in his official and individual capacity, Police Officer Jane Doe, New York City, in her official and individual capacity and others
Intervenor: Sergeants Benevolent Association, Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc., Detectives' Endowment Association, Inc. and others
Floyd v. City of New York
as 13-3088
Defendant: New York City Police Officer Rodriguez, in his official capacity, New York Police Officer Moran, in his individual capacity, Raymond Kelly, Commissioner New York City Police, in his individual and official capacity and others
Petitioner: James Sample, Associate Professor, Hofstra Law School, Rudolph W. Giuliani, Richard J. Holwell, Esq. and others
Intervenor: Detectives' Endowment Association, Inc., Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Lieutenants Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Lalit Clarkson, David Ourlicht, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, David Floyd and others
Defendant / Appellant: City of New York
grant et al
as 2:2021cv06665
Petitioner: larry grant, Ph Ce, Long Beach Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shiver v. City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02992
Plaintiff: Madison Shiver
Defendant: NYPD Police Officers John/Jane Does Numbers 1-10, CITY OF NEW YORK, NYPD Police Officer Rodriguez, Shield No. 3458 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
1940 Carmen, LLC v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2020cv08130
Defendant: Does 2-10 inclusive, Dyneka Collier, Unknown City of Los Angeles Police Officer sued as Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff: Louis Marshall, 1940 Carmen, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, Alexander Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins-Payne v. NYC 67th Precinct et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02985
Plaintiff: Patricia Atkins-Payne
Defendant: Police Officer Gene, Sgt./P.O. Officer Jane Doe, Police Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?