Cases 1 - 10 of 2,186
King v. Lee County et al
as 2:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Tammy King
Defendant:
LEE COUNTY, a Florida political subdivision, Sheriff Carmine Marceno, Deputy Sheriff Jay Brett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Mitchell, II v. Douglas County, et al
as 24-1839
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell, II
Defendant:
Douglas County, a Nebraska Political Subdivision, Donald W. Kleine, in his individual and official capacity as Douglas County Attorney, Douglas County Attorney's Office and others
McGhee v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-2460
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MARTIN MCGHEE
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, a sovereign State of the United States of America, RYAN FORSMAN, as an individual and in his official capacity as police officer employed by the City of Flagstaff, DARA RABIN, as a private party state actor and others
ROOFERS LOCAL 30 COMBINED WELFARE FUND et al v. PRAVCO, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
ROOFERS LOCAL 30 COMBINED WELFARE FUND, ROOFERS LOCAL 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND, ROOFERS LOCAL 30 COMBINED ANNUITY FUND and others
Defendant:
PRAVCO, INC. and PRAVEEN SHARMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Emrit et al v. The Republic of Cuba et al
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba, Embassy of Cuba, Cuban Intelligence Service (CIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Attica Scott, et alIn re: Attica Scott, et al
as 24-501
Petitioner:
In re: ATTICA SCOTT, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, CORBIN SMITH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, KAYLA MEISNER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY METRO GOVERNMENT, GREG FISCHER, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of Louisville, KY, ROBERT SCHROEDER, individually and in his official capacity as Interim Chief of the Louisville Metropolitan Police Department and others
Stuart v. City of Scottsdale, et al.
as 24-2386
Plaintiff:
MARK STUART, an Individual and Chairman doing business as Save Our Preserve Incorporated doing business as Save Our Preserve Political Action Committee of Scottsdale
Defendant:
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a Municipal Corporation and a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, TOM CLEARY, JASON GLENN and others
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 et al v. Rubio et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Rick Scott, Senator Chris Coons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Emrit v. United States Embassy of Poland et al
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit Presidential Candidate Number P60005535; also known as (aka) Ronald Satish Emrit, & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America and (aka) Ronald Satish Emrit, & Presidential Committee
Defendant:
United States Embassy of Poland, Embassy of Poland in the United States, State Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Emrit et al v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
Hon. John Roberts, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Justice Samuel Alito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
