Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Tolbert v. Polk County Jail
as 6:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Tolbert
Defendant:
Polk County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Polk County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
Polk County Jail and Teresa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Duncan v. Joshua Tessier, et al
as 24-1481
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kenya Duncan
Defendant:
Joshua Tessier, Head Practitioner, Naphcare, Polk County Jail and others
Burtton v. Polk County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
Taft Cornelius Burtton
Respondent:
Polk County Jail and U.S. Marshalls Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Polk County Jail et al
as 8:2023cv02663
Plaintiff:
Terrance Terrell Williams
Defendant:
Polk County Jail, Sgt and Transport Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. v. Polk County Jail
as 4:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith and Michael Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Polk County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kenya Duncan
Defendant:
C. Williams, Polk County Jail, Swearingen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodge v. Polk County Jail et al
as 9:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Michael Bee Hodge
Respondent:
Polk County Jail, Byron Lyons, Luna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Schneider et al
as 4:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kenya Duncan
Defendant:
K. Schneider, C. Williams, Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Tessier et al
as 4:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kenya Duncan
Defendant:
Joshua Tessier, Naph Care, Polk County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
