Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Ponder
as 0:2023mc60899
Plaintiff: Josephine Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In re: General Motors, LLC
as 23-104
Petitioner: In re: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Respondent: DENNIS SPEERLY, JOSEPH SIERCHIO, DARRIN DEGRAND and others
ABERNATHY et al v. CARLYLE GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv03603
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ABERNATHY, CEDRICK ARTHUR, LARRY BESS and others
Defendant: The Carlyle Group, Inc., MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, MANTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McZeal et al v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB et al
as 9:2022cv81848
Plaintiff: Alfred McZeal, Jr and Veronica Ponder Waters
Defendant: Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB doing business as Christiana Trust as Owner Trustee of the Residential Credit Opportunities Trust V, CJJFN, LLC, Nelsy Grajales and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hardie's Fruit & Vegetable Co LP et al v. Ponder Foods LLC et al
as 3:2022cv02306
Plaintiff: Hardie's Fruit & Vegetable Co LP and Hardies Fruit and Vegetable Company-South LP
Defendant: Ponder Foods LLC, Benjamin H. Ponder, Amy B Ponder and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00769
Plaintiff: Nichols, Bob Williams, Dale Nichols and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Brian Ponder v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
as 21-12761
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRIAN LAMAR PONDER
Defendant / Appellee: EXPERIAN
Ponder v. Wild We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01390
Plaintiff: Michael Ponder
Defendant: Hans-Peter Wild
Interested Party: Lezlie Gunn
Ponder v. Wild
as 2:2021ms00053
Plaintiff: Michael Ponder
Defendant: Hans-Peter Wild
Kendrick et al v. Apple Inc
as 4:2021cv00976
Plaintiff: Kim Kendrick, Brianna Kruz Smith, Cassandra White and others
Defendant: Apple Inc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?