Cases 1 - 10 of 137
BANNER v. ROWDY et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
MONTREALL BANNER
Defendant:
C/O ROWDY, C/O GOMEZ, MAC MILLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORBETT v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.
Defendant:
ERIK HOOKS, CHRISTOPHER RICH, KATY POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. USA
as 3:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Michael Lamont Poole
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
COOPER v. SANYANG et al
as 1:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
DARRELL BERNARD COOPER
Defendant:
LAWANDA SANYANG, LADONNA PRICE, ROBIN WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUSGROVE v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2022cv01125
Plaintiff:
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, KATE POOLE, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Carver et al
as 3:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
Ramar Dion Benjamin Crump
Defendant:
Ben Carver, Saint T. Tapp, David E. Cothron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDIN v. PEAKE et al
as 1:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, OFFICER WILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Setser et al
as 1:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Hall
Defendant:
B. Setser, B. Trivette, Samuel Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. LANCE et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
RICKY BANKS
Defendant:
DR. EDWARD LANCE, RN GREEN, M. Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
