Cases 21 - 30 of 63
POOLE v. HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2019cv04718
Defendant:
HUA LUO, M.D., UNKNOWN MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTY #1, MATT A RUTZ, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON POOLE and KARY DANGLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SEEKINS v. CHEP SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02224
Plaintiff:
NICKOLAS SEEKINS
Defendant:
CHEP SERVICES, LLC, CHEP CONTAINER AND POOLING SOLUTIONS, INC., CHEP USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLUE WORLD POOLS, INC. v. LINDLE
as 4:2019cv00061
Plaintiff:
BLUE WORLD POOLS, INC.
Defendant:
GEORGE LINDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POOL v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2019cv00942
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER W. POOL
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BELL v. NATIONAL SWIMMING POOL FOUNDATION
as 1:2019cv00874
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
NATIONAL SWIMMING POOL FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03823
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00128
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01471
HR:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Manager:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Upervisor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plant Manager:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Division Manager:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Body Manufacturing Manager:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
