Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Atkisson v. Pool Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jim Atkisson
Defendant:
Pool Corporation , SCP Distributors, LLC and Superior Pools Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Reaves et al v. Poole's Cable Services, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00043
Plaintiff:
Dean M. Reaves, Jr. , Garry Pitts and Sean K. Berry
Defendant:
Poole's Cable Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jackson et al v. Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00565
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jackson , All Plaintiffs , Tawanda Jackson and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Industries, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poole v. Sun Life Financial (U.S.)Services Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00652
Plaintiff:
William Poole
Defendant:
Sun Life Financial (U.S.)Services Company, Inc. , Sun Life Financial Distributors, Inc. , Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Winters v. Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv00597
Plaintiff:
Timothy Winters
Defendant:
M. Johnson, L. Brown, A. Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Ross et al
as 1:2011cv00199
Plaintiff:
Minnie Quinn
Defendant:
Scott Ross, West Point Police Department, Justice Court Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Poole v. Ford et al
as 2:2011cv00158
Plaintiff:
Crawthorne Poole
Defendant:
Ben Ford, Brian Patterson and Angie H. Deil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morea v. Guittierrez et al
as 3:2011cv00411
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Morea
Defendant:
Phillip Guittierrez, Sherly Poole and Michael Guest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
